In this episode of North Haven News: After passing a budget that was supposed to preserve current staffing levels, Superintendent Dr. Cronin says that the town’s Special Education staff will go from 35 to 26. Why did he make this decision, and what happens to those 9 extra Special Ed. teachers?
Episode 88: June 13, 2011
About admin
Subscribe
3 Responses to Episode 88: June 13, 2011
Leave a Reply Click here to cancel reply.
- QU To Host Information Session for Prospective Physician Assistant Graduate Students May 20, 2013
- Budget Referendum Vote May 20, 2013
- North Haven Middle School & High School Lockdown Lifted May 17, 2013
- North Haven Legislative Delegation Announces State Grant to Begin Clean Up of Former Circuit-Wise Property May 14, 2013
- Foul Ball? May 8, 2013
- Public Meeting Scheduled To Address Concerns About Methadone Clinic Coming to North Haven October 16, 2012
- Episode 17: September 10, 2008 September 9, 2008
- Episode 69: 2010 Memorial Day Parade May 30, 2010
- 2010 Annual Budget Town Meeting May 12, 2010
- Episode 88: June 13, 2011 June 12, 2011
- Matt: You are all foolish assumption making, misinformed...
- admin: Tracey, I would suggest contacting the administrat...
- anthony cavallaro: Please do all in your power to influence your coll...
- Tracey Best: Want to donate money to 6year old heart fund...nee...
- Mr. & Mrs. Tracey C. Best: Want to donate money to 6 year old heart fund... N...

that was great!
thanks for the information trail…..
cheri
Thanks for the details. A serious concern for all parents of North Haven students!
Chris- thank you for reporting the details of this important issue to the citizens of North haven.
The Special Ed staffing proposal is predicated upon 2 assumptions:
1) That the special education needs of the current students are currently completely being met without utilizing every man-hour available (indicating a resource surplus).
2) That the population of special education students in North Haven will remain the same or decrease over the next few years (this has not been the trend)
I personally cannot even consider any staff reductions until I see documented evidence supporting these two assumptions.
Moreover, I agree with your assertion that a proposal to make staff changes after the budget approval (that clearly stated no staff changes) seems like a classic case of “bait-and-switch”.
Thanks,
Nancy